<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>devrobboek - Latest Comments in UPDATE Statements and Indexes</title><link>http://devrobboek.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://devrobboek.disqus.com/update_statements_and_indexes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:03:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: UPDATE Statements and Indexes</title><link>http://dev.robboek.com/2009/05/29/update-statements-and-indexes/#comment-16108127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, I couldn't find an email address for you so I decided to leave a comment instead. Would you like to trade links? let me know, Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Walter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:03:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UPDATE Statements and Indexes</title><link>http://dev.robboek.com/2009/05/29/update-statements-and-indexes/#comment-16108126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dynamic SQL is only one option. As I said in the post, you can create multiple procedures to handle the most frequently updated value combinations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Boek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:59:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UPDATE Statements and Indexes</title><link>http://dev.robboek.com/2009/05/29/update-statements-and-indexes/#comment-16108125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some people might say  "dynamic sql" is worse than&lt;br&gt;multiple index update&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Denis Langlais</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>